The legal consciousness of society from the legalrationality to the legalreasonly
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

legal consciousness, sense, mind, legalrationality, legalreasonly

How to Cite

Dergachov, Y. (2018). The legal consciousness of society from the legalrationality to the legalreasonly. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (3-4), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.3-4.16

Abstract

The article deals with questions of legal consciousness of society in the context of those philosophical categories like «ratio» and «reason». It was researched a retrospective of philosophical tradition of these concepts. It is proposed to allocate the form of legal consciousness, depending on the development of the latter. According to this criterion to distinguish two forms of legal consciousness, which called legalrationality and legalreasonly. In exploring these forms of the legal consciousness and determined the need for the transformation of the legal consciousness of modern society against the overwhelming legalrationality to dominate in awareness of legalreasonly principles.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.3-4.16
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Batyshchev H.S. Dyalektyka y smysl tvorchestva: k krytyke antropotsentryzma. Dyalektyka refleksyvnoy deyatelʹnosty y nauchnoe poznanye. – Rostov-na-Donu, 1983. – 240 s.
2. Voznyak V.S. Spivvidnoshennya rozsudku i rozumu: filosofsʹko-pedahohichnyy kontekst. Avtoreferat dys. na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya d.filos.n. – Lʹviv, 2010. – 37 s.
3. Voznyak V.S. Spivvidnoshennya rozsudku i rozumu yak filosofsʹko-pedahohichna problema. – Drohobych, 2008. – 346 c.
4. Hehelʹ H.V.F. Kto myslyt abstraktno? // Hehelʹ H.V.F. Raboty raznykh let : V 2 t. T.1. – M., 1970. – S. 391.
5. Hehelʹ H.V.F. Éntsyklopedyya fylosofskykh nauk: Nauka lohyky. T.1. – M., 1974. – 452 s.
6. Dzhordano Bruno. O prychyne, nachale y edynom. – M., 1934. – 232 s.
7. Kant Y. Sochynenyya v shesty tomakh. T.3. – M., 1964. – 799 s.
8. Kopnin P.V. Rassudok i razum i ikh funktsii v poznanii // Voprosy filosofii. – 1963. – №4. – S. 69–73.
9. Kuzanskiy N. O neinom // Kuzanskiy N. Soch. : V 2-kh t. T.2. – M., 1980. – S. 247–283.
10. Lazarev V.V. Shelling. – M., 1976. – 199 s.
11. Lukanin R.K. Ucheniye Platona o rassudke i razume i yego razvitiye Aristotelem // Filosofskiye nauki. – 1987. – № 7. – S. 56–64.
10. Rassudochnoye i razumnoye myshleniye v razvitii poznaniya // Marksistsko-leninskaya dialektika: V vos'mi knigakh. – M., 1985. Kniga 3: Dialektika protsessa poznaniya. – S. 173–197.
11. Semenov YU.I. Osnovnyye ponyatiya logiki razumnogo myshleniya. – Filosofiya i obshchestvo. Vypusk №2 (58) – 2010. – S. 5–26.
12. Chernov S.A., Shevchenko I.V. Fridrikh Yakobi i nemetskiy idealizm // Filosofskiye nauki. – 2004. – № 11. – S. 39–55.
13. Sheler M. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya. – M., 1994. – S. 490.
14. Sheler M. Ordo amoris // Tam zhe. – S. 339–377.
15. Engel's F. Dialektika prirody // Marks K., Engel's F. Sobr. soch. Izd. 2. T.20. – S. 537–538.
16. Yaspers K. Filosofskaya vera // Yaspers K. Smysl i naznacheniye istorii. – M., 1991. – S. 420–508.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.