The modern type of sociality: between past and oughtness
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

modernity, anti-modernity, sociality, individualization, identity

How to Cite

Lukashenko, M. (2018). The modern type of sociality: between past and oughtness. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (5-6), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.5-6.04

Abstract

The article reveals revolutionary changes in sociality implemented in the period of the late modernity in the context of opposition of individual and social; modern conservatism and traditionalism; anti-modern and modern sociality. Individualization is a specifically-modern sociality. It is determined by the laws of the class, identity to which ought to be constantly confirmed. The modern individualization is opposed to an anti-modern personality that is developed in unity with others. Modernism is characterized with the tendency for separation, and also with the aspiration for solidarity filling social being with millenarian expectations and wistfulness for the past.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.5-6.04
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Bauman Z. Yndyvydualyzyrovannoe obshchestvo. – M., 2005. – 390 s.
2. Bauman Z. Plynni chasy: zhyttya v dobu nepevnosti. – K., 2013. – 176 s.
3. Delëz ZH., Hvattary F. Anty-Édyp: Kapytalyzm y shyzofrenyya. – Ekaterynburh, 2007. – 672 s.
4. Yermolenko V.A. Modern ta antymodern u filosofiyi kulʹtury Valʹtera Benʹyamina: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. filos. nauk: spets. 09.00.04 «filosofsʹka antropolohiya, filosofiya kulʹtury». – K., 2008. – 20 s.
5. Zhyzhek S. Drazhlyvyy subʹyekt: vidsutniy tsentr politychnoyi ontolohiyi. – K., 2008. – 510 s.
6. Latur B. Novoho Vremeny ne bylo. Ésse po symmetrychnoy antropolohyy. – SPb., 2006. – 240 s.
7. Lyakh V.V. Svoboda i poshuk novykh form identychnosti v dobu hlobalizatsiyi // Mulʹtyversum. Filosofsʹkyy alʹmanakh. – K., 2006. – № 57.
8. Lyakh V.V. Sotsialʹnyy kharakter lyudyny i problema identychnosti v dobu hlobalizatsiyi // Mulʹtyversum. Filosofsʹkyy alʹmanakh. – K., 2011. – № 9 (107). – S. 3–26.
9. Teylor CH. Neporozuminnya: debaty mizh liberalamy ta komunitarystamy // Suchasna politychna filosofiya. – K., 1998. – S. 544–575.
8. Lyakh V.V. Sotsialʹnyy kharakter lyudyny i problema identychnosti v dobu hlobalizatsiyi // Mulʹtyversum. Filosofsʹkyy alʹmanakh. – K., 2011. – № 9 (107). – S. 3–26.
9. Teylor CH. Neporozuminnya: debaty mizh liberalamy ta komunitarystamy // Suchasna politychna filosofiya. – K., 1998. – S. 544–575.
10. Bauman Z. Svoboda. – M., 2006.
11. Sytnichenko L.A. Universalʹni ta osoblyvi vymiry zahalʹnolyudsʹkykh tsinnostey v suchasniy politychniy filosofiyi // Obgruntuvannya tsinnostey: suchasni filosofsʹki dyskursy. – K., 2016.
12. Teylor CH. Sekulyarna doba. Knyha persha. – K., 2013. – 664 s.
13. Teyyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka. – M., 1987. – 240 s.
14. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlyvosti. – K., 2001. – 822 s.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.