Abstract
The two World Wars of the last century questioned the previously unqualified faith in the power of human reason and provoked devastating criticism of the European Enlightenment project, which was seen as the main source of such faith in reason, science, and the human ability to make responsible and rational decisions and actions. The criticism of faith in reason was partly justified, especially in the part where it was directed against unjustified scientism and the tendency to elitism and repressive instrumental rationality often associated with it. However, the criticism of reason in itself is something unnatural when it comes to Homo sapiens. The article argues for the need to revise ideas about the human mind and its main tasks – in particular, the hypothesis is put forward about the need to change the epistemological approach to reason to an ontological one, and the instrumental view of reason to a moral understanding of the purpose of reason. Attempts to rethink the metaphor of the Enlightenment in the new ontology of light are revealed – in particular, in the works of Martin Heidegger and Karl Jaspers. It is argued that the crisis of normativity, which has widely unfolded in the 20th century not only in science, but also in the sphere of morality and culture in general, cannot be overcome by rejecting normativity or by recognizing a weak relativistic version of normativity. The thesis is proven that, if the crisis of the classical Enlightenment is the result of the loss of social normativity, then the New Enlightenment should be based on a new normativity, and above all – a new integrity of reason as its moral integrity. It is substantiated that the new common world should not be a common world of survival and fear, but a responsible common world of virtuous reason. Within the framework of transcendentally and intersubjectively defined norms inherent to humanity and developed by Mankind in its concrete history, which has already actually taken place, representatives of a responsible common world can create new forms of normativity – on the basis of multiple social practices of the embodiment of virtuous reason.
References
Boichenko, M. (2024). Philosophy of the New Enlightenment as a Response to the Challenges of War. Philosophy in the Modern World [Electronic Resource]: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference, November 22-24, 2024. Kharkiv, pp. 3-6. Retrieved from https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/83959 [Іn Ukrainian].
Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Condorcet, J.-A.-N. (1795). Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progres de l'esprit humain. Ouvrage posthume de Condorcet. [Paris?]: [s.n.].
Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Fasman, J. (2021). We see it all. Liberty and justice in an age of perpetual surveillance. Public Affairs.
Foucault, M. (2015). What is Enlightenment? Karivets, І. (Trans.) Humanitarian Visions, 1(2), 109-116. Retrieved from https://kontur.media/m_foucault_enlightenment-2 [Іn Ukrainian].
Fowles, J. (1986). The Blackwood Tower. Ruzhytskyi, V. & Stelmakh, D. (Trans.). Kyiv : Dnipro. [Іn Ukrainian].
Freud, Z. (2019). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Kharkiv : Folio. [Іn Ukrainian].
Friedrich, C. J. (1971). Secrecy versus Privacy: The Democratic Dilemma. In Roland, P. J., & Chapman, J. W. (Еds.). Nomos XIII: Privacy. New-York : Atherton Press. Pp. 105-120.
Gray, J. (1995). Enlightenment's Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. London and New-York, Routledge. 203 p.
Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Hesse, H. “O Freunde, nicht diese Töne!”. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 03.11.1914, 1-2.
Hesse H. “O Freunde, nicht diese Töne!”. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 03.11.1914, 1-2.
Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, Th. (1947). Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam : Querido.
Jaffe, A. (2024). Marxism, Spinoza and the “Radical” Enlightenment. Spil`ne/Commons. Retrieved from https://commons.com.ua/en/marksizm-spinoza-ta-radikalne-prosvitnictvo. [Іn Ukrainian].
Jaspers, K. (1932). Philosophie. Zweiter Band. Existenzerhellung. Berlin : Verlag von Julius Springer.
Kant, I. (1795). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Königsberg : Friedrich Nicolovius.
Kozubek, J. (2018). Enlightenment rationality is not enough: we need a new Romanticism. Aeon. 18 April. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/ideas/enlightenment-rationality-is-not-enough-we-need-a-new-romanticism
Lloyd, H. M. (2019). Why the Enlightenment Was Not an Age of Reason. Chopin, P. (Trans.) Histor!ans. 29.04.2019. http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/dyskusiya/2627-genri-
Pinker, S. (2019). Enlightenment Today. Arguments for Reason, Science, and Progress. Liubenko, О. (Trans.) Kyiv : Nash Format. [Іn Ukrainian].
Proleiev, S. (2024). Transition to Modernity as a Transformation of Interactions. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 2(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2024.2.1.1
Rogozha, M. M. (2009). Social Morality: Collisions of Minimalism. Kyiv : PARAPAN. [Іn Ukrainian].
Rolland, R. (1919). “Déclaration de l’Indépendance de l’Esprit”. L’Humanité, 26.06.1919. https://europaverbinden.de/wp-content/uploads/I%C3%9Fler-Kopiervorlagen.pdf
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
Shenk, D. (2006). Surveillance Society. EMBO reports. 7 Spec. No., 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400735.
Skovoroda, H. (2016). Complete Academic Collection of Works. Kharkiv : Publisher Savchuk O. O. [Іn Ukrainian].
Thorpe, Ch. (2022). Sociology in Post-Normal Times. London/Lanham, MD : Lexington Books/The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
Weizsäcker, E. U. von, & Wijkman, A. (2018). C’mon! Don’t Stick to Outdated Philosophies!. In: Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer, New-York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1_2
Weizsäcker, E. U. von, & Wiikman, A. (2019). Come on! Capitalism, Short-sightedness, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Sirosh, Yu. (Trans.). Kyiv : New Format. [Іn Ukrainian].
Yermolenko, A. M. (2018). Academic Philosophy in the Dimension of Paradigmatic Changes. Philosophical Thought, (6), 6-11. [Іn Ukrainian].
York, J. C. (2021). Silicon Values: The future of free speech under surveillance capitalism. New-York : Verso.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
