Risk society: the sociocultural dimension of Safety
USSUE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

risk society, threats, safety culture, socio-cultural space, values

How to Cite

Ananin, V., & Horlynskyi, V. (2023). Risk society: the sociocultural dimension of Safety . Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(2(178), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2023.2.1.2

Abstract

The article examines the genesis of the concept of risk society, outlines the development of the theoretical discourse on the issue of risks in the postmodern era. It is shown that for Ukrainian socio-philosophical thought, the relevance of turning to the analysis of the socio-cultural tools for solving the crisis problems of society is intensified by the threats and risks caused by the war with the Russian Federation. The motivating role of culture as a self-organizing and self-preserving potential of human development is revealed. Security culture is analyzed as a socio-cultural process of interaction of culture elements with people's life activities and their security. The safety culture should contain a stabilizing social program that functions on the basis of a system of knowledge, principles, norms, values and relations in the field of safety. It was concluded that the leading cultural factor in the formation of universal security relations should be a system of universally recognized life values and social norms of life, which performs the function of the "universal code" of human culture, which contains the acquired historical experience of humanity in the struggle for its survival, coded in terms of values. A set of attributive values that form the core of the value structure of the safety culture is defined, namely: viability and sustainability of society; reliability of life support systems; orderliness, predictability of social processes; social integration and consolidation; adaptability of management and security systems; predictability of military, economic, social, environmental threats; the possibility of preventing dangers; comprehensive protection of human life in emergency situations; integration into the regional and global security system. The view on values as a substantial basis of civilizational development is analyzed. The significance of the value dimension of the safety culture is proven, which consists in the fact that values perform the function of a system of coordinates and standards of social behavior that determine a certain level of trust and security of public life. It is substantiated that the appeal to culture, as a potential source of self-preservation and stabilizing force of existence of the Ukrainian nation in the conditions of war threats, is able to stop the humanitarian catastrophe in the country caused by the war. The specific functions and content of the safety culture in the risk society are revealed. The value principles of culture as a regulatory factor in maintaining security in Ukrainian society in wartime conditions are analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2023.2.1.2
USSUE PDF (Українська)

References

Ananin, V. O., & Horlynskyi, V. V. (2021). Mental structures of consciousness as a prerequisite for sustainable development and security of society. Мultiversum. Philosophical almanac, 2(174), vol. 1, 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2021.2.1.01. [In Ukrainian].

Ananin, V. O., & Horlynskyi, V. V. (2022). Development of the idea of existential security in postmodern philosophy. Мultiversum. Philosophical almanac, 1(175), vol. 1, 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35423/2078–8142.2022.1.1.3. [In Ukrainian].

Antypenko, I. V. (2019). The ontological basis of the phenomenon of risk in modern methodological approaches of foreign riskology. Elektronnyi zhurnal «Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok» (Public administration: improvement and development), 1, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307–2156–2019.1.26. [In Ukrainian].

Voropai, T. S. (2015). Giorgio Agamben: the state of emergency as a paradigm of modern politics. Visnyk KhNU im. V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Filosofiia. Filosofski perypetii» (Bulletin of KhNU named after V. N. Karazina. Series «Philosophy. Philosophical vicissitudes»), 52, 78-81. Retrieved from: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philosophy/article/view/7404/6878. [In Ukrai-nian].

Huntington, S. (1999). The only superpower. Nezalezhnyi kulturolohichnyi chasopys «I» (Independent cultural journal "Y"), Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. Foreign Affairs, 16. Retrieved from: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/ n16texts/hanting1.htm. [In Ukrainian].

Karikh, I. (2017). Cultural policy as an instrument of national security policy of ukraine. European political and law discourse, 4(2), 136-140. Retrieved from: https://eppd13.cz/wp–content/uploads/2017/2017–4–2/23.pdf. [In Ukrainian].

Krymskyi, S. (2009). Morning thoughts. Kyiv: Maisternia Biletskykh. Retrieved from: https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Krymskyi_Serhii/Rankovi_rozdumy_zb [In Ukrainian].

Lukkyanets, V. S. (2008). “Science of the new century. Humanitarian transformations”, in Science and education: modern transformations. Kiev: PARAPAN.

Risks in today's unstable society: social and cultural dimensions: monograph; under the editorship. (2021). Skokova, L. G. (Ed.). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://i–soc.com.ua/assets/files/journal/monografiya21_04_22.pdf [In Ukrainian].

The world hybrid war: the Ukrainian front. (2017). Horbulina, V. P. (Ed.). Kyiv: NISD. Retrieved from: https://niss.gov.ua/publikacii/monografii/svitova –gibridna–viyna–ukrainskiy–front–monografiya [In Ukrainian].

Slovyk, P. Fyshkhoff, B. & Lykhtenshtejn, S. (2005). Facts Against Fear: Understanding Perceived Risk. Decision-making in uncertainty. Kah-neman, D., Slovik, P. & Tversky, A. (Eds.). Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center.

Ukraine as a risk society. (2021). Collection of materials of the All-Ukrainian scientific conference. Dnipro: Vydavnycho–polihrafichnyi dim «Format A+». Retrieved from: https://www.dnu.dp.ua/docs/facults/fsocgum/sociologia/2021%20Ukrajina_suspilstvo%20ryzyku.pdf [In Ukrainian].

Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in Eine Andere Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Retrieved from: http://socio.karazin.ua/resources/ 60be71e2e8e5ef7171ef10f4f60ca8a4.pdf

Giddens, A. (1991). Fate, Risk and Security. In: Giddens, A. Modernity and Self–Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Modernity _and_Self_identity.html?hl=es&id=Jujn_YrD6DsC&redir_esc=y

Luhmann, N. (1991). Der Begriff Risiko. In: Luhmann, N. Soziologie des. Risikos. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 9-40. Retrieved from: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/2973

Massumi, B. (2015). Ontopower: War, Powers, and the State of Perception. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375197

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.