Keywords
human being, education, culture, tradition, innovation, education axiology, European vector
How to Cite
Andrushchenko, T. (2018). National and universal as dominant values of modern educational policy (european context). Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (9-10), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2015.9-10.09
Abstract
Process of formation of a new paradigm of development of education in European space was analyzed; one of the central issues is the relationship between national and universal in education; author asserts the thought about the fact that these existences at the level of national education systems should be optimally combined; at the same time, European tradition^ historically crystallized values – anthropocentrism and democracy, human rights, peacefulness, solidarity, ecological safety, tolerance, etc., which should be included (and on which should be based) in any national system of education; establishment of such a system in Ukraine is at the initial state; signs repressive pedagogy, left for Ukraine from education system of the former Soviet Union are still quite noticeable; need for formation of democratic world and democratic human being requires accelerated reformation of education in the context of overall European strategy of development of Ukraine as an independent state.
References
1. Boyko A.I. Problemy rozvytku systemy osvity v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsiy // Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. – 2008. – №2. – S. 35.
2. Gidens E. Nestrymnyy svit: yak hlobalizatsiya peretvoryuye nashe zhyttya. − K.: Alʹterpres, 2004. – S. 37.
3. Marchenko O.V. Transformatsiya suchasnoho prostoru osvity: tendentsiyi ta priorytety // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsialʹnymy systemamy. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 67.
4. Klepko S.F. Filosofiya osvity v yevropeysʹkomu konteksti. – Poltava, 2006. – S. 32.
5. Bazhanovsʹka O.V. Rolʹ zahalʹnolyudsʹkykh tsinnostey v protsesi formuvannya hromadyanyna yevropeysʹkoyi derzhavy // Visnyk LDPU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – 2003. – № 7 (63). – S. 11.
6. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. – Lʹviv, 1998. – S. 50.
7. Ryzhak L. Yevrointehratsiya vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny: aksiolohichnyy vymir // Visn. Lʹviv. un-tu im. I. Franka. – Filosofsʹki nauky. – 2008. – Vyp. 11. – S. 27–29.
8. Boyko A.I. Problemy rozvytku systemy osvity v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsiy // Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. – 2008. – №2. – S. 36.
9. Moroz N.S. Zahalʹna kharakterystyka systemy vykhovnoyi roboty v serednikh navchalʹnykh zakladakh Velykoyi Brytaniyi // Pedahohichnyy alʹmanakh. – 2009. – Vyp. 4. – S. 50.
10. Bazhanovsʹka O.V. Rolʹ zahalʹnolyudsʹkykh tsinnostey v protsesi formuvannya hromadyanyna yevropeysʹkoyi derzhavy // Visnyk LDPU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – 2003. – № 7 (63). – S. 13.
11. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. − Lʹviv, 1998. – S. 25, 66.
12. Bakirov V.S. Vyshcha shkola Ukrayiny: na shlyakhu do yevropeysʹkykh standartiv // Akademycheskaya mobylʹnostʹ – vazhnyy faktor obrazovatelʹnoy evroyntehratsyy Ukrayny : Mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Kharʹkov, 16–19 noyab. 2010 h.; redkol.: V.Y. Astakhova y dr. – Kharʹkov, 2010. – S. 40.
13. Kryzhko V. Aksiolohichni vymiry osvitnikh zmin na zasadakh standartiv yevropeysʹkoho osvitnʹoho prostoru // Intehratyvnyy kharakter tsinnisnykh vymiriv osvity v standartakh Bolonsʹkoho protsesu: Mater. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. (Berdyansʹk, 21–23 travnya 2008 r.). – Berdyansʹk, 2008. – S. 16.
14. Bohdanova N.H. Zhyttyetvorchistʹ osobystosti v totalitarnomu cuspilʹstvi // Hileya: nauk. visn.: Zb. nauk. pratsʹ. – K., 2011. – Vyp. 45 (3). – S. 245.
15. Sheshukova H.V. Rolʹ y mesto systemy obrazovanyya v polytycheskoy sotsyalyzatsyy naselenyya sovremennoy Rossyy // [Élektronnyy resurs] Teoretycheskyy zhurnal CREDO NEW. – Rezhym dostupa: credonew.ru/content/view/94/23.
16. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. − Lʹviv, 1998. − S. 54–57.
17. Fedorova I I. Tvorchyy potentsial osvity v umovakh aksiolohichnoho relyatyvizmu suchasnoho suspilʹstva // Visn. NTUU KPI: Filosofiya. Psykholohiya. Pedahohika. – Vyp. 2. – 2011. – S. 169.
18. Avshenyuk N.M. Rozvytok transnatsionalʹnoyi vyshchoyi osvity v konteksti hlobalizatsiyi rynkiv osvitnikh posluh // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsialʹnymy systemamy. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 70.
19. Fedorova I.I. Tvorchiy potentsial osvity v umovakh aksiolohichnoho relyatyvizmu suchasnoho suspilʹstva // Visn. NTUU KPI: Filosofiya. Psykholohiya. Pedahohika. – Vyp. 2. – 2011. – S. 171.
20. Dzvinchuk D.I. Osvita v istoryko-filosofsʹkomu vymiri: tendentsiyi rozvytku ta upravlinnya. – K., 2006. – S. 288.
21. Andreev A.A. Nekotorye osobennosty obrazovanyya v ynformatsyonnom obshchestve // Obrazovatelʹnye tekhnolohyy. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 7.
22. Boyko A.I. Problemy rozvytku systemy osvity v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsiy // Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. – 2008. – №2. – S. 35–37.
23. Kramarenko A.M. Tsinnisni oriyentatsiyi maybutnikh fakhivtsiv pochatkovoyi osvity yak osnova utverdzhennya yikh zhyttyevykh pryorytetiv // Visn. LNU im. T. Shevchenka. – 2011. – № 20 (231). – CH. II. – S. 168.
24. Oleynykova O.D. Obrazovatelʹnye tsennosty y tsennostnaya ynversyya v kulʹture // Fylosofyya obrazovanyya dlya KHKHI veka. – 2001. – № 1. – S. 70.
25. Kyrychenko I. Tsina tsinnisnykh zmin // Dzerkalo tyzhnya. – 30 lystopada 2013 r.
2. Gidens E. Nestrymnyy svit: yak hlobalizatsiya peretvoryuye nashe zhyttya. − K.: Alʹterpres, 2004. – S. 37.
3. Marchenko O.V. Transformatsiya suchasnoho prostoru osvity: tendentsiyi ta priorytety // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsialʹnymy systemamy. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 67.
4. Klepko S.F. Filosofiya osvity v yevropeysʹkomu konteksti. – Poltava, 2006. – S. 32.
5. Bazhanovsʹka O.V. Rolʹ zahalʹnolyudsʹkykh tsinnostey v protsesi formuvannya hromadyanyna yevropeysʹkoyi derzhavy // Visnyk LDPU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – 2003. – № 7 (63). – S. 11.
6. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. – Lʹviv, 1998. – S. 50.
7. Ryzhak L. Yevrointehratsiya vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny: aksiolohichnyy vymir // Visn. Lʹviv. un-tu im. I. Franka. – Filosofsʹki nauky. – 2008. – Vyp. 11. – S. 27–29.
8. Boyko A.I. Problemy rozvytku systemy osvity v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsiy // Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. – 2008. – №2. – S. 36.
9. Moroz N.S. Zahalʹna kharakterystyka systemy vykhovnoyi roboty v serednikh navchalʹnykh zakladakh Velykoyi Brytaniyi // Pedahohichnyy alʹmanakh. – 2009. – Vyp. 4. – S. 50.
10. Bazhanovsʹka O.V. Rolʹ zahalʹnolyudsʹkykh tsinnostey v protsesi formuvannya hromadyanyna yevropeysʹkoyi derzhavy // Visnyk LDPU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. – 2003. – № 7 (63). – S. 13.
11. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. − Lʹviv, 1998. – S. 25, 66.
12. Bakirov V.S. Vyshcha shkola Ukrayiny: na shlyakhu do yevropeysʹkykh standartiv // Akademycheskaya mobylʹnostʹ – vazhnyy faktor obrazovatelʹnoy evroyntehratsyy Ukrayny : Mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Kharʹkov, 16–19 noyab. 2010 h.; redkol.: V.Y. Astakhova y dr. – Kharʹkov, 2010. – S. 40.
13. Kryzhko V. Aksiolohichni vymiry osvitnikh zmin na zasadakh standartiv yevropeysʹkoho osvitnʹoho prostoru // Intehratyvnyy kharakter tsinnisnykh vymiriv osvity v standartakh Bolonsʹkoho protsesu: Mater. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. (Berdyansʹk, 21–23 travnya 2008 r.). – Berdyansʹk, 2008. – S. 16.
14. Bohdanova N.H. Zhyttyetvorchistʹ osobystosti v totalitarnomu cuspilʹstvi // Hileya: nauk. visn.: Zb. nauk. pratsʹ. – K., 2011. – Vyp. 45 (3). – S. 245.
15. Sheshukova H.V. Rolʹ y mesto systemy obrazovanyya v polytycheskoy sotsyalyzatsyy naselenyya sovremennoy Rossyy // [Élektronnyy resurs] Teoretycheskyy zhurnal CREDO NEW. – Rezhym dostupa: credonew.ru/content/view/94/23.
16. Ruzhmon D. Yevropa u hri. Shans Yevropy. Vidkrytyy lyst do yevropeytsiv. − Lʹviv, 1998. − S. 54–57.
17. Fedorova I I. Tvorchyy potentsial osvity v umovakh aksiolohichnoho relyatyvizmu suchasnoho suspilʹstva // Visn. NTUU KPI: Filosofiya. Psykholohiya. Pedahohika. – Vyp. 2. – 2011. – S. 169.
18. Avshenyuk N.M. Rozvytok transnatsionalʹnoyi vyshchoyi osvity v konteksti hlobalizatsiyi rynkiv osvitnikh posluh // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsialʹnymy systemamy. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 70.
19. Fedorova I.I. Tvorchiy potentsial osvity v umovakh aksiolohichnoho relyatyvizmu suchasnoho suspilʹstva // Visn. NTUU KPI: Filosofiya. Psykholohiya. Pedahohika. – Vyp. 2. – 2011. – S. 171.
20. Dzvinchuk D.I. Osvita v istoryko-filosofsʹkomu vymiri: tendentsiyi rozvytku ta upravlinnya. – K., 2006. – S. 288.
21. Andreev A.A. Nekotorye osobennosty obrazovanyya v ynformatsyonnom obshchestve // Obrazovatelʹnye tekhnolohyy. – 2009. – № 3. – S. 7.
22. Boyko A.I. Problemy rozvytku systemy osvity v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsiy // Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. – 2008. – №2. – S. 35–37.
23. Kramarenko A.M. Tsinnisni oriyentatsiyi maybutnikh fakhivtsiv pochatkovoyi osvity yak osnova utverdzhennya yikh zhyttyevykh pryorytetiv // Visn. LNU im. T. Shevchenka. – 2011. – № 20 (231). – CH. II. – S. 168.
24. Oleynykova O.D. Obrazovatelʹnye tsennosty y tsennostnaya ynversyya v kulʹture // Fylosofyya obrazovanyya dlya KHKHI veka. – 2001. – № 1. – S. 70.
25. Kyrychenko I. Tsina tsinnisnykh zmin // Dzerkalo tyzhnya. – 30 lystopada 2013 r.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.