To interpret an interpreter or a social history of the French receptions of Nietzschе
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

reception, internal history of ideas, external history of ideas, structure of the philosophical (scientific, literary, educational) field, profane interpretations, professional interpretations

How to Cite

Yosypenko, O. (2018). To interpret an interpreter or a social history of the French receptions of Nietzschе. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (1-2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.1-2.06

Abstract

On the example of Nietzsche’s reception in the French culture of the 20th century the historical-philosophical problem of reception is formulated, the social-institutional factors of address to the ideas of one or another thinker are considered, the inclusion of reception in logic’s interaction of different philosophical and cultural traditions is investigated in the article. Addressing to the analyses of L. Pinto and V. Descombes the author shows that the process of transformation  of Nietzsche to the classic of the French philosophy is determined by the underlying structures of the French philosophical field, such, as a scientific culture of commentator/profane, researcher/creator, erudite/artist, and, also, by the political, moral and scientific problems of the French culture in 1950–1960th which the French philosophers tried to solve by using of Nietzsche’s philosophy. The publication shows the importance of realization of «external history of ideas» that investigates the social-institutional identities of carriers of ideas and exposes the social conditions of circulation the ideas and receptions. The author considers it is necessary to realize a holistic approach to the history of ideas that envisages the contextualisation of «internal history of ideas», i.e. histories of discursive practices, in «external history of ideas», i.e. invisible, subjected to the reconstruction the philosophical field structures with their hierarchies themes, concepts, authors, research programs that need reconstruction and  in a final analysis determine the sense and orientation of philosophical formulae and declarations.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.1-2.06
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Bourdieu, P. Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées // Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. – 2002/5. – n. 145. – P. 3–8.
2. Deleuze, G. Nietzshe et la philosophie. – Paris: P.U.F., 1962. – 232 p.
3. Descombes, V. Le moment franiçais de Nietzsche // Pourquoi nous de sommes pas nietzschéens. – Paris: Bernard Grasset, 1991. – Р. 99–128.
4. Hadot, P. La philosohie comme manière de vivre. Entretiens avec Jannie Carlier et Arnold I. Devidson. – Paris: Albin Michel, 2001. – 280 р.
5. Libera, A. de. Penser au Moyen Age. – Paris: Seil, 1991. – 408 р.
6. Pinto, L. Les neveux de Zarathoustra. La réception de Nietzsche en France. – Paris: Seil, 1995. – 218 р.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.