Efficiency of use of potential of non-state actors of information security
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

information security, safety culture, actor of information security

How to Cite

Zakharenko, K. (2018). Efficiency of use of potential of non-state actors of information security. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (1-2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.1-2.05

Abstract

Maximum result for the protection of domestic information-cultural space is provided by cooperation of its state and non-state actors.However, democratic countries have significant experience in the using the potential of non-state actors of various information security societies, associations and organizations.As well as state institutions, they are generators of new ideas and alternative approaches in the field of information security. NGOs are also tools of social control, instruments of influence on setting goals and values of society, means of the formation of public opinion. But not all NGOs can be considered as potential actors of information security.Even those among them who are legal, sometimes are used in the information war against Ukraine. Therefore the state should create legal, organizational and economic conditions for the development of non-state actors of information security, and promote their comprehensive cooperation with various government agencies.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.1-2.05
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Krutov V. Shchodo pravovoho statusu struktur nederzhavnoho sektoru natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny // Problemy borotʹby zi zlochynnistyu. – 2009. – №2 (57). – S. 161–168.
2. Krutov V. Shchodo pravovoho statusu struktur nederzhavnoho sektoru natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny // Problemy borotʹby zi zlochynnistyu. – 2009. – №2 (57). – S. 161–168.
3. Lisovsʹka YU.P. Administratyvno-pravova diyalʹnistʹ nederzhavnykh orhaniv ta orhanizatsiy yak strukturnykh elementiv systemy zabezpechennya informatsiynoyi bezpeky // Naukovi pratsi MAUP. – 2014. – Vyp. 2 (41). – S. 108–113.
4. Burylo YU.P. Uchastʹ nederzhavnykh subʺyektiv u zdiysnenni derzhavnoho upravlinnya informatsiynoyu sferoyu // Pravova informatyka. – 2007. – № 4. – S. 31–41.
5. Alyamkin R.V. Pravove zabezpechennya natsionalʹnoyi informatsiynoyi bezpeky // Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 91–96.
6. Doklad Hruppy pravytelʹstvennykh ékspertov po dostyzhenyyam v sfere ynformatyzatsyy y telekommunykatsyy v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosty (A/65/201) // Nʹyu-York, 2012, Orhanyzatsyya Obʺedynennykh Natsyy. – 57 s.
7. Pavlyuk K. Diyalʹnistʹ neuryadovykh hromadsʹkykh orhanizatsiy u konteksti zabezpechennya natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny // Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi derzhavnoho upravlinnya pry Prezydentovi Ukrayiny. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 210–218.
8. Horyelov D. Analitychna zapyska viddilu stratehiy rozvytku hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva ta protydiyi koruptsiyi. – Rezhym dostupu : http://human-rights.unian.net/ukr/detail/187585
9. Borysova L.V. Informatsiyna bezpeka yak vyznachalʹnyy komponent natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny // Pravo i bezpeka. – 2013. – № 1 (48). – S. 39–42.
10. Byktymyrova Z.Z. Bezopasnostʹ v kontseptsyy razvytyya cheloveka // Obshchestvennye nauky y sovremennostʹ. – 2002. – № 6. – S. 135–142.
11. Ukrayinchuk V.M. Zabezpechennya natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky v umovakh formuvannya v Ukrayini hromadyansʹkoho suspilʹstva. – Kharkiv: Un-t vnutr. sprav. – 1996. – 164 s.
12. Demʺyanchuk V.A. Kulʹtura bezpeky lyudyny – bezpeka suspilʹstva v KHKHI stolitti // Onovlennya zmistu, form ta metodiv navchannya i vykhovannya v zakladakh osvity. – Naukovi zapysky Rivnensʹkoho derzhavnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Vypusk 8 (51). – Rivne, 2014. – S. 42–46.
13. Popper K.R. Otkrytoe obshchestvo y eho vrahy. T. 1: Chary Platona. – M., 1992. – 448 s.
14. Dzʹobanʹ O.P. Natsionalʹna bezpeka Ukrayiny: kontseptualʹni zasady ta svitohlyadnyy sens. – Kharkiv, 2007. – 284 s.
15. Hryhorʺyev V.I. Informatsiyna bezpeka u derzhavnomu upravlinni // Bibliotekoznavstvo. Dokumentoznavstvo. Informolohiya. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 53–55.
16. Lantinov YA.O. Shchodo vyznachennya natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny yak obʺyekta kryminalʹno-pravovoyi okhorony // Forum prava. – 2011. – № 1. – S. 570–574.
17. Horyelov M.YE. Tsyvilizatsiyna istoriya Ukrayiny // M.YE. Horyelov, O.P. Motsya, O.O. Rafalʹsʹkyy. – K., – 2005. – 632 s.
18. Pravosvidomistʹ i pravova kulʹtura yak bazovi chynnyky derzhavotvorchoho protsesu v Ukrayini. – Kharkiv, 2009. – 352 s.
19. Yudin O.K. Kontseptualʹnyy analiz urazlyvosti derzhavnykh informatsiynykh resursiv // Naukoyemni tekhnolohiyi. – 2013. – № 3 (19). – S. 299–304.
20. Bila knyha Derzhspetszvʺyazku. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.dsszzi.gov.ua/ dstszi/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=49942&cat_id=49941
21. Kashtelyan S.O. Sutnistʹ ta zmist ponyattya «bezpeka» u konteksti zabezpechennya natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny u prykordonniy sferi // Chestʹ i zakon. – 2013. – № 1 (44). – S. 17–21.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.