Scientific Knowledge in the Arguments of «Methodological Anarchism»
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

argument, logic, methodological anarchism, proliferation, alternative theory, rationality, rule

How to Cite

Komaha, L. (2018). Scientific Knowledge in the Arguments of «Methodological Anarchism». Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (3-4), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.3-4.17

Abstract

In the article there is investigated the “methodological anarchism” of P. Feyerabend who argued against the idea of “prescriptive method” or the “prescriptive type of rationality” and formulated a new approach to the logic of science development. Unlike the previous methodological approach, there was suggested the principle of “anything goes”, which means that there may be a lot of theories and they may be grounded upon various types of rationality. Based on this, Feyerabend postulated the principle of proliferation (multiplying) which is the requirement of constructing of the best possible quantity of theories capable of multiplying. He stands for methodological pluralism and against methodological monism. The necessity of the proliferation principle application is supported with the facts being theoretically relative; however, a theory foresight has never fitted experimental data with absolute accuracy. As a result, science development is made possible through mutual criticizing of the confronting positions.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2016.3-4.17
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Ivin A.A. Osnovy teorii argumentatsii. – M., 1997. – 352 s.
2. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. – M., 1983. – 605 s.
3. Feyyerabend P. Izbrannyye trudy po metodologii nauki. – M., 1986. – 543 s.
4. Feyyerabend P. Otvet na kritiku // Struktura i razvitiye nauki. – M., 1978. – 488 s.
5. Khayyek F.A. Pagubnaya samonadeyannost'. Oshibki sotsializma. – M., 1992. – 346 .
6. Khramova V.L. Kul'turologicheskiye obrazy nauki v postpozitivizme // Sofíya. Kul'turologíchniy zhurnal. – 2011. – № 11. – S. 14–58.7. Feyerabend P. Explanation. Reduction and Empiricism // Minnesota Studies in the Philophy of Science. – Vol. III. – Minneapolis, 1962. – P. 28–97.
8. Feyerabend P. Changing Patterus of Reconstruction // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. – 1977. – Vol. 28, № 4. – P. 351–369.
9. Feyerabend P. Logic, Literacy and professor Gellner // The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. – 1976. – Vol. 27, № 4. – P. 381–391.
10. Feyerabend P. Consolations for the Specialist // Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. – Cambridge. – 1970. – P. 202–208.
11. Hayek F.A. The Fortunes of Liberalism // The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, Volume IV. – Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1992. – 287 р.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.