Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The article explores a framework of phenomenological treatment access to Descartes’ philosophy as one of main current Cartesian research projects. Especially, J.-L. Marion’s interpretative approach is considered, which reveals the basic trends of present-day phenomenological Cartesianism. The author brings to light two main difficulties, causing a phenomenological critique of Descartes, namely its Husserlian version: illegitimacy of passage between immanent and transcendent orders (“Cartesian circle” in a Husserlian understanding) and presence of mediate element in this passage (that goes against phenomenological claim to immediate giveness). The author determines some ways to overcome these hindrances in the frame of phenomenological philosophy which appraises a Cartesian legacy as fundamental constituent in a building of its own project. Introducing of the concept of Other into phenomenological discourse is considered to be one of such ways and is analyzed in terms of Marion’s treatment of Cartesian positions. Phenomenology of Other is regarded as a source of critical means that as opposed to Husserlian critique of Cartesian approach helps forward revealing of such authentic features of latter that remained hidden under the pressure of historico-philosophical stereotypes and are to be revealed from the perspective of phenomenological interpretations.
References
2. Gusserl' E. Kartezianskiye meditatsii / E. Gusserl'. – M: «Akademicheskiy proyekt», 2010. – 229 s.
3. Gusserl' E. Krizis yevropeyskikh nauk i transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya / E. Gusserl' – Sankt-Peterburg: «Vladimir Dal'», 2004. – 399 s.
4. Il'ina A. Kontsept Drugogo v rakurse transtsendentalizma // Koynoníya: Spetsvipusk № 2, Vísnik Kharkívs'kogo natsíonal'nogo uníversitetu ím. V.N. Karazína. – 2011. – №950. – S. 165–195.
5. Íl'í̈na A. Dekonstruktsíyniy povorot u transtsendental'nomu mislenní // Sententiae. – 2015. – № 33. – S. 125–148.
6. Kebuladze V. Fenomenologíya dosvídu / V. Kebuladze – K.: Dukh í lítera, 2011. – 280 s.
7. Maryon ZH.-L. Nasyshchennyy fenomen // (Post)fenomenolohyya: novaya fenomenolohyya vo Frantsyy y za ee predelamy. – M: «Akademycheskyy proekt», 2014. – S. 63–99.
8. Khoma O. Istoryko-filosofsʹki stereotypy ta suchasne prochytannya Dekartovykh «Medytatsiy» // «Medytatsiyi» Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachenʹ: Zhan-Mari Beysad, Zhan-Lyuk Maryon, Kim San On-Van-Kun. – K.: Dukh i Litera, 2014. – S. 333–360.
9. Yampolʹskaya A. Fenomenolohycheskaya reduktsyya kak fylosofskaya konversyya // Voprosy fylosofyy. – 2012 – №9. – S. 157–166.
10. Yampolʹskaya A. Fenomenolohycheskoe prochtenye ontolohycheskoho arhumenta: Levynas y Koyre. [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://doxa.onu.edu.ua/Doxa10/182-187.pdf (28.10.2016).
11. Derrida J. Abraham, l'autre // Judéités: questions pour Jacques Derrida. – Paris: Galilée, 2003. – P. 11–42.
12. Derrida J. Violence et metaphysique. Essai sur la pensée d'Emmanuel Levinas // Derrida, J. L’Ecriture et la Differance. – Paris: Seul, 1967. – P.117-228.
13. Descartes R. Méditations métaphysiques [Електронний ресурс]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://commonweb.unifr.ch/artsdean/pub/gestens/f/as/files/4610/42065_151000.pdf (28.10.2016).
14. Gouhier A. L' ordre des raisons selon Descartes // Cahiers du Royaumont: Descartes. – Paris: Minuit, 1957. – P. 72–87.
15. Heffernan, G. An essay in epistemic Kuklophobia: Husserl's critique of Descartes' conception of evidence. – Husserl Studies. – 1999, V. 13, Issue 2. – P. 89–140.
16. Lévinas E. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’extériorité / E. Levinas. – La Haye: Martin Nijhoff, 1961. – 347 p.
17. Marion J.-L. Questions cartésiennes. II, Sur l'égo et sur Dieu / J.-L. Marion. – Paris : Presses universitaires de France, 1996. – 403 p.
18. Martin, W.M. Descartes and the Phenomenological Tradition // A companion to Descartes / J. Broughton, J. Carriero (Ed.). – Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2008. – C. 496–512.
19. Mohanty, J. N. Intentionality and "possible worlds" // J.N. Mohanty. The possibility of transcendental philosophy. – Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985. – P. 25–44.
20. Mohanty, J.N. Towards a Phenomenology of Self-Evidence // D. Carr, E.S. Casey (Ed.). Explorations in phenomenology. – The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. – P. 208–229., 85 p.
21. Striker, E. The Husserlian Foundations of Science / E. Striker. – Dordrecht: Springer. 1997. – 306 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.