Concepts of humanization of education, politics, power in the socio-turbulent paradigm of the XXI century
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

humanization of education, humanization of politics, socially turbulent space

How to Cite

Kubalskyi, O. (2022). Concepts of humanization of education, politics, power in the socio-turbulent paradigm of the XXI century. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1(175), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.12

Abstract

The issue of dehumanization influences of the global socially turbulent space on such traditional forms of social life as education, politics, power is actualized. There is a need to form new worldview and axiological concepts in the system of views of young people, educated and formed from a personal point of view in an environment of instability, lack of moral base and ethical guidelines, constant change of essential elements of life. It turns out that only a strong semantic and value basis of the new paradigm of humanization of education and politics is able to slow down and counteract the negative trends of socially turbulent space.It is concluded that modern concepts of humanization of education, science, politics, and society correspond to an updated version of humanism – posthumanism, which introduces society and nature into the sphere of scientifically rational search along with man. These concepts are transformed into conceptual approaches to the formation of the humanistic paradigm of the XXI century. Influenced by post-classical science and post-industrial trends, it is based on human understanding by means of science, uses proven knowledge and relies on the possibility of logical reflection, focuses on the consideration of scientific achievements through the prism of man, in the context of becoming technologically convenient world. Influenced by phenomenology, existentialism, and humanistic psychology, she views the world as autonomous, holistic, and self-sufficient, capable of freely determining human activity and at the same time subject to universal values.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.12
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

References

Andrushchenko, V. (2004). Humanitarian policy of Ukraine: methodology, theory, practice. Rozdumy pro osvitu. [Іn Ukrainian].

Bronnikova, L. V. (2015). Knowledge society and post-classical science: the interaction of contexts. Visnyk NAU. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia, 22, 35-38. [Іn Ukrainian].

Voronkova, V. (2008). Humanization of education, science, politics, society. Filosofiia osvity, 1-2(7), 204-220. [Іn Ukrainian].

Vyzhletsov, H. P. (1996). Axiology of culture. SPb.: Aleteiia. [Іn Russian].

Hladkyi, O. V. & Kylivnyk, V. S. (2017). The humanistic paradigm is the basis for the formation of a healthy personality. Naukovi zapysky Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Statti uchasnykiv tretoi mizhnarodnoi mul-tydystsyplinarnoi konferentsii «Chornomorski naukovi studii», 27, 63-67. [Іn Ukrainian].

Hovlet M., Ramesh M. (2004). Research of state policy: cycles and subsystems of politics. Lviv: Kalvariia. [Іn Ukrainian].

Honcharenko, S. (1997). Ukrainian pedagogical dictionary. K.: Lybid. [Іn Ukrainian].

Hrof, S. (2010). The structure of scientific revolutions. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 2, 105-112. [Іn Ukrainian].

Kyvliuk, O. P. (2015). Sociocultural phenomenon of modern education and science. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk (filosofski nauky), 101, 362-365. [Іn Ukraini-an].

Kryzhko, V. V. & Mamaieva, I. O. (2005). Axiological potential of public ed-ucation management. K.: Osvita Ukrainy. [Іn Ukrainian].

Krysovatyi, A. (2015). The main paradigms of education and their essential characteristics. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 1, 114-121. [Іn Ukrainian].

Kun, T. (2001). The structure of scientific revolutions. K.: Port-Royal. [Іn Ukrainian].

Ladychenko, V. (2007). Сivil society needs the ideology of humanism. Yurydychna Ukraina, 3, 4-9. [Іn Ukrainian].

Lysenko, Yu. V. (2012). Humanization of social policy in the context of de-mocratization. Derzhava i pravo, 56, 643-648. [Іn Ukrainian].

Maintser, K. (2010). Challenges of complexity in the 21st century. Voprosy fylosofyy, 10, 35-44. [Іn Russian].

Makukh, O. R. (2012). Humanism in politics: ways to assert. Problemy ta per-spektyvy rozvytku ekonomiky i pidpryiemnytstva ta komp’iuternykh tekhnolo-hii v Ukraini: zbirnyk tez za materialamy VIII Naukovo-tekhnichnoi konfer-entsii naukovo–pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv, 26-31 bereznia 2012 roku. [Іn Ukrainian].

Mynhulov, Kh. Y. (2016). Humanization of the image of science: methodolog-ical consequences. Vesnyk TvHU. Seryia «Fylosofyia», 1, 11-18. [Іn Russian].

Petrovskyi, P. M. (2008). Humanitarian paradigm in the system of public ad-ministration. [Іn Ukrainian].

Petrovskyi, P. M. The humanitarian paradigm as a theoretical and methodo-logical model of the social subject. Lviv Regional Institute of Public Admin-istration of the National Academy of Public Administration under the Presi-dent of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://www.lvivacademy.com/download_4/pozi ci-ya_download/social_subyekt.pdf [Іn Ukrainian].

Sakun, A. V., Kyvliuk, O. P. … Nesterova, M. O. (2020). Processes of humani-zation and humanization of education. Kyiv: KNUTD. [Іn Ukrainian].

Serheev, V. K. (2008). Philosophy of humanism and humanization of educa-tion. Yzvestyia Tomskoho polytekhnycheskoho unyversyteta, 313-6, 149-153.

Timofieieva, L. Yu. (2020). Humanistic paradigm: experience, challenges and prospects of criminal law of Ukraine. [Іn Ukrainian].

Fialko, N. A. (2015). Humanization of higher education: content and func-tional aspects. (Doctoral dissertation). [Іn Ukrainian].

Khozhylo, I. I. (2013). Humanization of public administration in Ukraine in terms of UN strategy. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, 2(2), 17-21. [Іn Ukrainian].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.