Issues of Ethics and Morality in Social Networks
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

copyright in social networks, self-identification, confidentiality, trust, cyberbullying

How to Cite

Oleinyk, A. (2022). Issues of Ethics and Morality in Social Networks. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1(175), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.4

Abstract

Today's information and digital age offers widespread use of social networks. Their use is widespread and affects all age groups, social classes and cultures. However, the wider use of these media outlets is accompanied by privacy and ethical issues. Based on this, the purpose of this article is to analyze current ethical and moral issues that have arisen in social networks. Thus, the object of study are the problems of ethics and morality in social networks. Philosophical and general scientific methods were used to achieve the goal. Among the general scientific methods of theoretical (analysis, generalization, classification and synthesis) and empirical (description and comparison) levels should be distinguished. Also, the bibliosemantic method was used to generalize the analysis of literature and own experimental data. As the main results, it should be noted that social networks have become an integral part of almost everyone's life. Social networks have many features. Of course, the initial function lies in the communication of users, but, as we see, social networks have become an excellent space for human self-identification. After all, in this virtual space a person constructs himself as he would like to see himself, often publishes what he lacks in real life. But with the advent of social media, the world has faced ethical and moral challenges in the digital environment as well. First of all, it is a question of confidentiality, trust and copyright. In addition, with the departure of a person into the virtual world, many people become victims of cyberbullying. All these concepts and processes have been discussed in detail in this paper. The article is of practical value in a number of areas, including political, social, pedagogical, educational, criminal and criminal justice.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.4
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

References

Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., Beninger, A. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73-98. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.riob. 2011.10.004

Dingwall, R. (2004). Professions and social order in a global society. International Review of Sociology, 9(1), 131-140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.1999.9971302

Dingwall, R., King, M. D. (1995). Herbert Spencer and the Professions: Occupational Ecology Reconsidered. Sociological Theory, 13(1), 14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/202002

Halapsis, A. V. (2008). Morality: transcendental basis and historical transformations (metaphysical aspect). Philosophy, Culture, Life. Special Issue, 1, 47-53. [In Ukrainian].

Markham, A. (2019). Lecture “Sticky Selfies: Morality and Affects in Visual Self-Presentation”. Retrieved from http://internetbeyond.net/2019. [In Ukrainian].

Borgmann, A. (2007). Real American Ethics: Taking Responsibility for Our Country. Chicago: University Press.

Deris, D. (2016). Ethical Issues in Social Networking. Retrieved from https://cariblogger.com/ethical-issues-in-social-networking

Vallor, S. (2011). Social Networking and Ethics. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-social-networking/#HisDefSocNetSer

Ethnic problems in social networks. (2014). Retrieved from https://cariblogger.com/ethical-issues-in-social-networking [In Ukrainian].

Murray, D. (2009). How copyright works with social networks. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancesmb.com/copyrights-and-social-media-issues-397821

U.S. Copyright Office. “Group design of photos”. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/group-photographs

D'Angelo, M. (2006). How to Avoid Copyright Infringement in the Age of Social Media. Retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/4693-legal-image-usage.html

Stokes, P. (2021). Deletion as second death: The moral status of digital remains. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(4), 1-12.

Sinovitz, R. (2022). “Culture of indignation” on the Internet: a tough guy on the other side of the monitor. Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/ a/29648115.html

Grubbs, J. B. (2019). Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0223749

Halapsis, A. V. (2017). Mirror Clio: Metaphysical comprehension of history. Dnipro: Serednyak.

Moor, J. H. (2005). Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 111-119.

Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the Internet Second edition. New-York: Routledge.

Bertolotti, T., Magnani, L. (2013). A philosophical and evolutionary approach to cyber-bullying: Social networks and the disruption of sub-moralities. Ethics and Information Technology, 15, 285-299.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.