Optics of Power: Social-philosophical Perspectives on Groups Representa-tion in Communities
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

visibility, authenticity, heteronomy, integration, reintegration, Ukraine

How to Cite

Balinchenko, S. (2022). Optics of Power: Social-philosophical Perspectives on Groups Representa-tion in Communities. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, 1(1(175), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.1

Abstract

In the article, the recent social-philosophical discussions on authenticity and autonomy have been reviewed through the optics of power. The latter is understood as the regulation of the actors’ state of being marked or unmarked in the social-cultural space. Another dimension of the optics is the adjustment of the access to power and representation of the groups in media-related and legal discourses. The visibility asymmetry has been considered through the social representation of the groups, with attention paid to the concepts of recognition, exoticization and adaptation, power, and powerlessness. The immediate and terminated effect of visibility on social cohesion and integration processes in communities has been reviewed in this context. The distortions of visibility, such as invisibility and super-visibility, require estimation of the unmarked normalcy threshold for the communities; therefore, the Ukrainian perspective on the issue involved the analysis of the conflict-related massive protracted inner displacement in the country. Based on the situation descriptions and action plans suggested in the project on the Strategy of Integration of Internally Displaced Persons and Implementation of Long-Term Solutions to Internal Displacement until 2023, the distortions of visibility in the Ukrainian communities have been assessed. One of the suggested perspectives implies the possible impact evaluation of media-type visibility of the internally displaced persons and residents of the non-government-controlled areas in Ukraine on the scenarios of reintegration of the territories temporarily occupied by the Russian Federation and Russia-backed forces. The theoretical adjustment lies in finding the visibility theory gap and formulation of the further research question on the correlation between the group visibility and reconciliation being facilitated by the actors.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2022.1.1.1
ISSUE PDF (Українська)

References

Brighenti, A. (2007). “Visibility: a category for the social sciences”, Current Sociology 55(3): 323–342. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392 107076079.

Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England.

Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana and Chicago: The University of Illinois Press.

IOM’s Assistance to Conflict-affected People in Ukraine (2021). Bi-monthly Report. IOM Ukraine, June-July. Retrieved from https://www.iom. org.ua/sites/default/files/iom_ukraine_assistance_report_june-july_2021_ eng.pdf

Luhmann, N. (2000). Art as a social system. М. Eva (Trans). Knodt. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

MacKay, K. (2020). Authenticity and Normative Authority: Addressing the Agency Dilemma with Values of One`s Own. Journal of Social Philosophy 51 (3): 349–370. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12309.

Perry, B. (2015). “‘All of a sudden, there are muslims’: visibilities and islam-ophobic violence in Canada”, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 4(3): 4–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd. v4i3.235.

Salem, Ay. (2014). Niklas Luhmann, observing systems and social critique. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 34(1): 17–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.15388/SocMintVei.2014.1.7458.

Toward a Common Future: Voices from both Sides of the “Contact Line”. (2020). USAID. SEED. Retrieved from https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ ukraine/en/home/library/recovery-and-peacebuilding/SCORE-report-toward-a-common-future.html.

Ukrainians Perceptions of the Human Rights Challenges Triggered by the Conflict in the East of Ukraine. (2020). UNDP. Retrieved from https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/en/home/library/recovery-and-peacebuilding/results-of-the-omnibus-polling.html.

Report on the results of the public consultation on the draft of the CMU Resolution “On Approval of the Strategy of Integration of Internally Displaced Persons and Implementation of Long-Term Solutions to Internal Displacement until 2023” (Zvit za resultatmi publichnoho hromadskoho obhovorennia proektu rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy “Pro skhvalennia Strategii intehratsii vnutrishnio peremishchennykh osib ta vprovadzhennia dovhostrokovykh rishen shchodo vnutrishnioho peremishchennia na period do 2023 roku”). (2020). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YgWtWr. [In Ukrainian].

The Ministry of Reintegration announces the electronic consultations (Minreintehratsii povidomliae pro provedennia elektronnykh konsultatsii). (2020). Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and IDPs of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3uGm9aM. [In Ukrainian].

Evaluation of implementation of the National Human Rights Strategy (2016-2019) (Otsinka implementatsii Natsionalnoi stratehii u sferi prav liudyny (2016-2019)). (2020). Retrieved from https://www.ua.undp.org/content /ukraine/uk/home/library/democratic_governance/the-national-human-rights-strategy-assessment.html. [In English and Ukrainian]

Proleev, S. (2021). Power and Society: Postmodern Perspective. Vlada i suspilstvo: postmoderna perspektyva. Kyiv, Dukh I Litera. [In Ukrainian].

Toffler, E. (2003). Powershift (Metamorfozy vlasti). Kh, Izdatelstvo ARTA. [In Ukraine].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.