Abstract
In the second decade of XXI century the pace of social development accelerated so dramatically fast, all of urgent questions stated by its unexpected changes and breaks require not only nontrivial and scientifically justified ideological answers, but also corresponding and correctly measured and pertinent political actions. Socio-philosophical research of revolutionary processes faces certain complications as to their theoretical reconstruction and scientific prediction. Those complications can be overcome only on the philosophical cognitive level. The study of historical experience, lessons of revolutions and reactions during periods of second half of 20-th century-beginning of 21-st century gives an intellectual benefit of premature awareness, prognostication of those processes as well as readiness to control them. On conditions of reevaluating the meaning of «evolution» it’s modernization and ambivalent interpretation, numerous explications and definitions, new theoretical conceptions and developments, scientific research, generalization and development of the notion’s semantic substance based on modern social upheavals and processes is undoubtedly relevant. During the time of revolutionary upheavals a state might occur, when a social movement as a result of denying existing order becomes extremely flexible and stands as an open transformation and beginning, a flow that unites mutually exclusive directions of changes development. Without the scientific understanding of reasons for these aftermaths and consciously avoiding them mass socio-political movements have no chances to perform as subjects of historical development.
References
2. Bobina O. Pro vytoky teoriyi revolyutsiyi // Suchasna ukrayinsʹka polityka. – 2008. – №13. – S. 88–93.
3. Halʹchynsʹkyy A. Pomarancheva revolyutsiya i nova vlada. – K., 2005. – 367 s.
4. Holdstoun D. K teoryy revolyutsyy chetvertoho pokolenyya // Lohos. – 2006. – №5 (56). – S. 58–103.
5. Ysaev L.M., Shyshkyna A.R. Ehypet•skaya smuta XXI veka. – M., 2012. – 112 s.
6. Kaharlytskyy B.YU. Neolyberalyzm y revolyutsyya. – SPb., 2013. – 256 s.
7. Myalo K.G. Pod znamenem bunta: Ocherki po istorii i psikhologii Molodezhnogo protesta 1950–1970-kh godov. – M., 1985. – 287 s.
8. Sorokin P.A. Sotsiologiya revolyutsii. – M., 2005. – 562 s.
9. Shubin A.V. Velikaya ispanskaya revolyutsiya. – M., 2012. – 610 s.
10. Skocpol T. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. – Cambridge; N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1979. – P. 407.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.