Formation of life-purpose orientations for existence of religious late Protestant confessions
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

existentialistic life-purpose situations, late Protestant confessions, existence, faith

How to Cite

Palchevskaya, O. (2018). Formation of life-purpose orientations for existence of religious late Protestant confessions. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (9-10), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2015.9-10.14

Abstract

This articles analyses way of formation of life-purpose orientations for existence of religious late Protestant confessions. Features of existentialistic situations are represented in the process of this formation. There is also an issue raised about genetically prognostic analysis of late Protestant confessions, which helps determine broader picture of their development. Furthermore, local scientific area has no famous works, which would be directly related to life-purpose orientations for existence of representatives of the abovementioned confession. Within the process of scientific exploration the author proves that the desire to avoid death as a condition of complete destruction makes a religious person be focused on formation of a range of life-purpose orientations for existence, which in their most general sense are related to proving their rescue by means of specific actions, content of their own life arrangement, which is built on the requirements of strict compliance with faith
and moral.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2015.9-10.14
PDF (Українська)

References

1. Blavatskaya Ye.P. Taynaya doktrina: V 4-kh tt. – T.1. – Dnepropetrovsk, 1997. – 1200 s.
2. Borisov Ye. Dialog kak sud'ba. Sobytiye s Drugim v ekzistentsial'noy analitike M. Khaydeggera. – Rezhim dostupa: http://tvti.narod.ru/borisov 5.htm
3. Glitsyn G.A., Petrov V.M. Garmoniya i algebra zhivogo. – M., 1990. – 128 s.
4. Gusserl' E. Logicheskiye isledovaniya. Kartezianskiye razmyshleniya. – M., 2000. – 752 s.
5. Knyazeva Ye.N., Kurdyumov S.P. Sinergetika – novoye mirovedeniye: dialog s I. Prigozhinym // Voprosy filosofii. – 1992. – S. 3–20.
6. Lutay V.S. Fílosofíya suchasnoí̈ osvíti. – K., 1996. – 256 c.
7. Mir filosofii: kniga dlya chteniya. V 2-ch. CH.1. Iskhodnyye filosofskiye problemy, ponyatiya i printsipy. – M., 1991. – 672 s.
8. Polak L.S. Varytsyonnye pryntsypy mekhanyky, ykh razvytye y prymenenye v fyzyke. – M., 1960. – 600 s.
9. Tykhoplav V.YU., Tykhoplav T.S. Kardynalʹnyy povorot. – Sankt-Peterburh, 2002. – 304 s.
10. Uylson H.A. Kosmycheskyy tryhher. – K., 2000. – 304 s.
11. Filosofiya. / Za red. V.I. Yaroshovtsya. – K., 2010. – 648 s.
12. Flʹorko L.YA. Samotnistʹ lyudyny yak problema suchasnoyi yevropeysʹkoyi filosofiyi: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. filosof. Nauk : – «Istoriya filosofiyi». – Lʹviv, 2005. – 16 s.
13. Khamitov N., Harmash L., Krylova S. Istoriya filosofiyi. Problema lyudyny ta yiyi mezh. – K., 2000. – 272 s.
14. Rollo Méy. Lyubovʹ y volya. Perevely O.O. Chystyakov y A.P. Khomyk. Rollo May. Love and Will. N.Y.: W.W. Norton&Co., 1969. – M.–K., 1997. – 384 s.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.