The author of the article analyzes the philosophical vision of the concept of "art" by Heidegger and Gadamer, gives comparative characteristic and reveals the meaning of how their vision of art has changed in different historical periods. Representativeness and presentability of art are considered from the point of view of both philosopher’s. Based on the ontological foundations of aesthetic experience, the article reveals the main theses of understanding the components of art and its characteristics in the process of life of the historical community. Gadamer's philosophical vision examines hermeneutic aesthetics and reveals the definition of art as one that includes play, symbol, and festival, and analyzes the vision of works of art as existing "in themselves". Haidegger's understanding of the influence of art on the aesthetic experience of human history is reproduced, which is based on its function of "formation and discovery of truth". To encounter the paradoxical movement at rest within a great artwork, Heidegger believes we need only follow the phenomenological dictum that we should “simply describe” our experience of the work of art “without any philosophical theory”. The author argues that Gadamer is not applying a hermeneutic method to aesthetic experience but seeking to expose the hermeneutical movement from part to whole within aesthetic experience. In other words, the claim that aesthetics should be taken up within hermeneutics is not an attempt to reduce aesthetics to another idiom. It announces an endeavor to articulate the hermeneutic dynamic of aesthetic experience itself. The tension in Gadamer’s position arises from asserting art’s autonomy and demanding that aesthetics be subsumed within hermeneutics. By analyzing the philosophical vision of art in the works of Heidegger and Gadamer, understanding its essence appears in the prism of the modern vision of the concept of art. The boundaries in our understanding of art and approach to it cannot be higher than it’s already existing. Dialogue and interpretation have an important means of overcoming misconceptions on the way to achieving mutual understanding in the process of becoming an understanding of the concept of art.
Bogachev, A. (2006). Philosophical hermeneutics. Kuiv. [In Ukrainian].
Wolin, Richard. Justification of Socrates. The wonderful and terrible life of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/200709 27002943/http://left.ru/2003/17/gadamer93.html [In Russian].
Gadamer, G. G. (1988). Truth and Method, Fundamentals of Philosophical Hermeneutics. Moscow. [In Russian].
Gadamer, G. G. (1991). Art and Inheritance, The relevance of beauty (pp. 228-241). Moscow: Iskusstvo. [In Russian].
Gadamer, G. G. Encyclopedia of modern Ukraine. Retrieved from http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=25464 [In Ukrainian].
Golovey, Victoria. Formation of the concept of representation in philosophi-cal and aesthetic discourse. Lesia Ukrainka East European National Universi-ty, Lutsk. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University. Collection of scientific works № 726-727. Philosophy. [In Ukrainian].
Koval, O. A, Kryukova, E. B. (2015). By the ways of Heidegger and Gadamer hermeneutics. Philosophical Journal. Book 8(4) (pp. 99-108). [Іn Russian].
Kahnweiler, D. I., Juan, Gris. (1946). Picasso's critical remark about the late Juan Gris in Canvailer. Sa vie, son oeure, ses ecrilis Paris.
Lavrukhin, A. V. The phenomenon of art in the philosophy of Shpet and Gad-amer. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, Philosophy. Sociology. Political sci-ence [In Russian].
Mikeshina, L. A. (2007). Representation: a particular method or a fundamen-tal operation of cognition. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, XI(1). [In Russian].
Tetyuev, L. I. (2017). The philosophy of the language of Hans-Georg Gadamer and his experience of interpreting a work of art. News of Saratov University. New series. Series. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 17(3). [In Russian].
Fubini. (1964). Musical aesthetics from the eighteenth century to the present. In Fubini, M. L'esetica musicale dal! Settecento a oggi.
Heidegger, M. (2003). Being and time. V. V. Bibikhin (Trans). Kharkiv: Folio. [In Russian].
Heidegger, M. (1993). Time of the picture of the world. In Marin Heidegger. Time and being: articles and speeches of Marin Heidegger. V. V. Bibikhin (Trans). (pp. 41-62. Articles and speeches; 49-51, 60-61). Moscow: Respu-blika. [In Russian].
Heidegger, M. (1991). What does it mean to think? In He is. Conversation on a country road. Select articles (pp. 143-144). Moscow. [In Russian].
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Gadamer’s Aesthetics. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer-aesthetics
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Heidegger’s Aesthetics. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger-aesthetics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.