The article analyzes the main elements of the modern theoretical concept of post-secularity in the context of comparative analysis with the main provisions of the theory of secularity, compares and analyzes different interpretations and different theoretical and methodological approaches to defining post-secular society. A retrospective analysis of the causes and process of formation of the postsecular paradigm in the conditions of observation of the inability to fully implement the principles of secularism is carried out. The correlation between post-secular reality and convergent processes as a reaction to socio-cultural transformations of society is revealed. The role of the ecumenical concept as one of the main elements of the convergent processes of society as a response to the spread of secular ideology and socio-cultural transformations of society is clarified. The complex comparative analysis and reflexive, critical views on sekulyarnist and plurality of interpretations outlined the use of the term "postsekulyarnist" in modern philosophical and religious studies plane. The concept of post-secularism does not aim to deny the existence of modern secular societies, or that they all totally move towards desecularization, but to demonstrate that the main directions of the secular paradigm remain often unrealized. Instead, religion is not seen as a relic of the past, but in the public sphere it is given a legitimate role, which can still remain the subject of debate. However, such tolerance should exclude the slightest suspicion of its possible repressive nature, when adherents of both religiosity and secularism recognize one after another the right to their own beliefs, the practice or non-practice of rituals. Evidence of post-secular ideological disposition is open Christian communities to adopt and implement in reality ecumenical concepts as well as their focus on directives post-secular philosophy and theology, intended to overcome destrukturyzatsiyu caused by secular processes in the political and cultural spheres of secular society and inner life of the Christian denominations.
Astapov, S. N. (2013). Freedom of conscience in the secular and postsecular paradigm. In: Scientific notes of the Oryol State University., 137–139. [In Russian].
Schedule of the day: how people from different countries relate to religion. (2016). In: BusinessViews. Retrieved from: https://businessviews.com.ua/ru/personal-life/id/grafik-dnja-kak-zhiteli-raznyh-stran-otnosjatsja-k-religii-1058 [In Russian].
Gutsalyuk, Yu. S. (2020). Ecumenical dialogue as the main condition for coexistence and cooperation of religions in the modern world. II scientific-practical conference. 144–147. [In Ukrainian].
Gutsalyuk, Yu. S. (2016). The phenomenon of ecumenism and its role in reli-gious life. In: Scientific notes of the National University "Ostroh Academy", Vol. 1, 125-132. [In Ukrainian].
Karpov, V. (2012). Conceptual foundations of the theory of desecularization. In: Journal “State, religion, church in Russia and abroad”. No. 2. 114-164. [In Russian].
Kuzmina, E. V. (2017). Postsecularity: trends in the analysis of the phenomenon in modern religious studies. In: Publication Gramota, Vol. 8, 106-112. [In Russian].
Martynyuk, E. (2016). Research of convergent processes of modern religious life. In: Collection of scientific works on philosophy and philology "DOKSA", 84-92. [In Russian].
Pashkov, K. V. (2013). Ideals of postsecular society and the realities of post-Soviet culture: Habermasian meditations. In: Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named of the V. N Karazina, 186-194. [In Russian].
Tytarenko, V. (2017). From prophecies in religion to forecasting in religious studies: history, theory, prospects: monograph. Kyiv: Center of Europe, 324 p. [In Ukrainian].
Habermas, J. (2002). The future of human nature. Publishing house “Ves Mir”, 144 p. [In Russian].
Habermas, J. & Ratzinger, J. (2006). Dialectics of secularization. On reason and religion. Moscow: Biblical and Theological Institute of St. Apostle An-drew, 112 p. [In Russian].
Shepetyak, O. M. (2014). Church and ecumenism: steps to unification. Institute of Society of Kyiv University named after Borys Hrinchenko. Vol. 1, 47-53. [In Ukrainian].
Steckl, K. "The Return of Religion" in Social Science and Political Philosophy. University of Thor Vergata Rome. Retrieved from: http://www.doctoran tu-ra.ru/images/pdf/kristina_moscow_rus.pdf [In Russian].
Steckl, K. (2012). European integration and Russian Orthodoxy: two perspec-tives within the paradigm of multiple modernities. Scientific electronic library "CyberLeninka". Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ evrop-eyskaya-integratsiya-i-russkoe-pravoslavie-dve-perspektivy-v-ramkah-para digmy-mnozhestvennyh-sovremennostey/viewer [In Russian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.