Contemporary ukranian philosophical science is in the process of finding new ways to justify their own senses and objectives in the context of realies and perspectives of the social complexity. In articles, they argument the presence of sociophilosophical receptions in contemporary ukranian philosophical studies of archetype phenomenon as a metodological tool of solving these objectives. The goal of the study is proving relevance and perspectivity of appeal in contemporary ukranian sociophilosophical discourse to phenomenon of archetype as such, which matches the specific of discource, it's theoretical, metodolical and practical principles. Objective of the work is analysis of the relevant state of the contemporary ukranian study of the archetype; justification of the presence of receptions of sociophilosophical discource in differently specialized contemorary ukranian studies given the crossdisciplinarity and cross-border issues of the archetype; outlining perspectives of using the archetypal approach as the part of metodological discource in ukranian sociophilosophical receptions of the future. Realizing these objectives makes up the novelty of the research, which has review and analyical nature. The deployment of metodological process of defining the roles of the phenomenon of archetype in ukrainian sociophilosophical paradigm was illustrated; proven the correlation between sociophilosophical studies of the phenomenon of archetype (in the context of it's connection with different sociohumanitary phenomena) and principles of social analysis in the future. Conclusion was made, that: 1) Definition of "archetype" is a base of the scientific discourse, which contributes to the development of sociohumanitary knowledge in general; 2) In crossdisciplinary studies of the phenomenon of archetype the metods of sociophilosophical analysis were used, which makes it possible for interpretation dialog and creation of practical correalitive models of social being; 3) At the level of sociophilosophical analysis of global social clusters, the archetype component in contemporary ukranian sociophilosophical studies stands out as system-forming; 4) An important metodological meaning archetypal approach gains in the area of influence of the ukranian society creation. Archetypal-axiological approach is defined as such, that is promising in the process of searching of new approaches in sociophilosophical discourse in solving relevant objectives of philosophy.
Afonin E. A., Ryabtsev G. L. (Eds). (2014). Archetype and public administra-tion: rationalization and normative practices.Zzbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ pere-mozhtsiv i krashchykh avtoriv Druhoho mizhnarodnoho konkursu molodykh uchenykh (Collection of scientific works of winners and best authors of the Second International Competition of Young Scientists). Kyiv, 120. [In Ukrainian].
Vedenyeyev, V. O. (2014). Theoreticаl basis of sociocultural dіmension mod-ern process of self-identification citizens of Ukraine. Hrani (Grani), № 6(110) cherven, 125-130. [In Ukrainian].
Hapeyeva O .L., Kysilʹ V .V. (2010). Ukrainian national idea: bibliographic review of modern views. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi oborony (Bulletin of the National Defense Academy). 5 (18), 11-16. [In Ukrainian].
Gorban’, A. V. (2004). “Stratagem of sustainable development of a society (the socially-philosophical analysis)”. Abstract of the dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of the candidate of philosophical sciences on a speciality 09.00.03 - Social philosophy and philosophy of a history. Tavricheskiy National University of V. I. Vernadskiy. Symferopol. 18. [In Ukrainian].
Dzeban, A. P. (2005.) National security in conditions of social transformation (theoretic and methodological analysis). Dissertation for the Doctor’s scientific degree in Philosophpical Sciencees in speciality 21.03.01 - humanitarian and political security of the state. National Institute for Strategic Studies. Kyiv. 32. [In Ukrainian].
Yeremenko, A. M. (2010). Historical event in the context of European tradi-tion: social-philosophical analysis. Thesis for the Doctoral Degree in Philoso-phy Speciality 09.00.03 – Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History. Dne-propetrovsk Oles Gonchar National University. Dnepropetrovsk. 34. [In Ukrainian].
Kovalchuk, N. D. (2007). Symbolic Structures of Ethnocultural Process in Ukraine. Thesis for taking the degree of Doctor of Philosophical Sciences. Specialization 09. 00. 04 - philosophical anthropology, philosophy of culture. Institute of Philosophy named G.Skovoroda of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. 20. [In Ukrainian].
Kovtun, N. M. (2008). Archetype of the cultural hero in Ukrainian spiritual tradition: historical-philosophical context. Manuscript. Dissertation for obtaining the scientific degree of the Candidate of Science in Philosophy. 09.00.05. – History of Philosophy. Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Kyiv. 26. [In Ukrainian].
Kozhemyakina, O. M. (2012). Archetypal principles of communicative practices of trust manipulation. Public administration: theory and practice. Proceeding of the Association of Doctors of Science in Public Administration: Sprcial Issue. Kharkiv, pp. 263–272. [In Ukrainian].
Kozlovets, M. A. (2009). The phenomenon of national identity: the challenges of globalization. Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo ZHDU im. I. Franka. 558. [In Ukrainian].
Kultenko, V. P., Radovilska, O. O. (2020). Features of scientific knowledge methodology). Hileya: naukovyy visnyk (Hileya: scientific herald). Vol. 152 (1). 18-190. [In Ukrainian].
Lyubchuk, O., Shostak, V. (2013). The Phenomenon of Archetype: Interpreta-tion, Manifestation and Role of the National Culture. Naukovyy visnyk Skhid-noyevropeysʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrayinky (Scientific Bulletin of the Lesia Ukrainka East European National University). № 11. 38-42. [In Ukrainian].
Kochubey, N. V., Nesterova, M. O. (Eds.) (2017). Human in Complexity. Sumy: Universytetsʹka knyha, 357. [In Ukrainian].
Maksymenyuk, M. Yu. (2010). Socio-philosophical discourse of development of polyethnic society. Humanitarnyy visnyk Zaporizʹkoyi derzhavnoyi inzhe-nernoyi akademiyi (Humanities bulletin of Zaporizhzhe State Engineering Academy). Vip. 40. 224-238. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN /znpgvzdia_2010_40_24 [In Ukrainian].
Menzhulin, V. (2005). New adventures of archetypes: the legacy of Carl Jung in the interpretations of Ukrainian dissertations-philosophers. Aktualʹni prob-lemy dukhovnosti. Zbirka naukovykh pratsʹ (Actual problems of spirituality. Collection of scientific works). Kryvyi Rih. 11-128. [In Ukrainian].
Nekita, A. (2001). Mechanisms of unconscious social transformation phenom-enology of archetype. Abstract of the dissertation for obtaining of degree of bachelor of philosophic science on speciality 09.00.03 - social philosophy and philosophy of history. Institute of Philosophy, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. Kiev. 14. [In Ukrainian].
Public administration: theory and practice: a collection of scientific works of the Association of Doctors of Science in Public Administration (2014). Kharkiv: Vyd-vo “DokNaukDerzhUpr”. № 2 (18) special issue. 244. [In Ukrainian].
Ruban, A. O. (2008). Worldview features of the Ukrainian national character (philosophical and anthropological analysis). Abstract of the Dissertation to achieve the Degree of the Candidate of Philosophical Science in speciality 09.00.04 - Philosophical Anthropology, Philosophy of Culture. The National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Drahomanov. Kiev. 20. [In Ukraini-an].
Alekseenko, A. P., Lisovy, V. M. (Eds.) (2010). Socio-philosophical and ethi-cal problems of medicine: Textbook. Manual. Kharkiv: Kolehium. 340. [In Ukrainian].
Stashkevich, O. (2015). Intellectual Civilization: Philosophical and Social Analysis. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate in philosophi-cal sciences by speciality 09.00.03 - social philosophy and philosophy of histo-ry. Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. 21. [In Ukrainian].
Chebotaryova, N. V. (2002). The phenomenon of aggression in human experi-ence: socialy-philosophical measurement. Abstract of a Candidate of Philoso-phy dissertation in the speciality 09.00.03 – social philosophy and history of philosophy. Kharkiv military university. Kharkiv. 14. [In Ukrainian].
Khamitov, N. V. (Ed.) (2019). Perspectives of self-realization of personality: projects of metaanthropology and postanthropology. The future of personali-ty and family: contexts of philosophical anthropology, psychoanalysis, art therapy and philosophical journalism. The approach of philosophical anthropology as the purpose of anthropology: a collection of scientific works. Kyiv: Interservice. 264. 7-25. [In Ukrainian].
Hoang Thi Cuc (2012). National mentality in the conditions of transformation of the modern Ukrainian Society. Abstract of the thesis for a candidate’s de-gree in philosophical Science. Speciality 09.00.03. - Social philosophy and philosophy of history. State Institution “The South Ukrainian National K. D. Ushinsky Pedagogical University. Odessa. 23. [In Ukrainian].
Shapoval, V. N. (2012). About sense and nonsense pure. Filosofsʹky obrii. Naukovo-teoretychny zhurnal. Vypusk 28. Kyiv-Poltava, 84-93. [In Ukraini-an].
DSpace at library NPU Dragomanova. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu. ua/simple-search (Application date 23.07.2020).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.