Philosophical analysis of the television industry: from the discourse of dominant structures to the dominance of discourse
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

mass culture, television industry, social communication, discourse, dominance, television series

Abstract views: 41
PDF Downloads: 18

How to Cite

Gulevsky, S. (2019). Philosophical analysis of the television industry: from the discourse of dominant structures to the dominance of discourse. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (5-6), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.5-6.05

Abstract

The article deals with the view of the television industry from a philosophical perspective. In particular, the analysis of critical theories concerning the economic foundations of the television industry, its functioning as a media, and peculiarities of definition in the socio-cultural space are carried out. There are considered the concepts of mass culture of Max Horkheimer and Theodore Adorno, the study of the instrumental character of the mass media by Herbert Marcuse, the concepts of the society of the play of Guy Deborah, the telematic screen of Jean Baudrillard, the neo-tribalism of Michel Muffesoli. The television industry appears as one of the most characteristic manifestations of mass culture and, on the other hand, as a central element of the modern cultural industry. The socio-cultural environment is not just a very important factor for the existence, development or transformation of any instrumental innovative system, but a basic condition for its emergence and existence. The entire information industry imposes certain patterns of intellectual, emotional responses that are transformed into public and private lifestyles. The media is the most vivid embodiment of the situation of "spectacle", which ensure its functioning and reproduction. There are considered television series as one of the most influential elements of the television industry, which has a significant impact on the formation of values and worldview of modern human. At one time, television quickly became socially dominant and partially supplanted other types of influence of mass culture on humans. Television is increasingly adapting to the latest mass media, in particular invading the realm of the Internet. The television industry forms not just tastes, but a dominant in society discourse through which imperceptibly and powerfully forms the life principles and strategy of behavior for the consumers of the television "product". All participants in the functioning of the television industry are participants in a complex communication process in which the television industry as a discourse becomes the real subject. Television series illustrated and largely modeled this discourse: they show convincingly how the "laws of genre" dictate the behavior of actors, and not only on screen, but of all social actors involved in the production and consumption of television series. Television creates a new shared atmosphere that is saturated with emotions – the basic meanings and values are transmitted through emotions, thanks to emotions the discourse of television becomes dominant and displaces other discourses.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.5-6.05
PDF (Українська)

References

Baudrillard, J. (2000). In the shadow of the silent majority, or the end of the social. Ekatery`nburg: Y`zd-vo Ural`skogo unyversyteta. 96 р. [In Russian].

Baudrillard, J. (2009). The transparency of evil. Moscow : Dobrosvet. 387 р. [In Russian].

Bojchenko, M. (2018). The power of discursive practices. Discourse in the context of changing socio-cultural space: materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific-Practical Conference with International Participation to the 95th Anniversary of Bogdan Khmelnytskyi Melitopol State Pedagogical University (April 20-21). R. Oleksenko (Ed.). Melitopol: Vzdavnycztvo MDPU imeni Bog-dana Xmelnyczkogo. 24-25. [In Ukrainian].

Debor, G. (1999). The society of the Spectacle. Moscow : Logos. 224 р. [In Russian].

Dzyuba, D. (2009). Mythmaking of postmodern television space of Ukraine. Ukrainian Art Studies: Materials, Research, Reviews: Collected Science Pa-pers. Kyiv. Vol. 9. 259-263. [In Ukrainian].

McLuhan, M. (2003) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Moscow : Zhukovskyj: Kanon-press-Cz, Kuchkovo pole. 464 р. [In Russian].

Marcuse, G. (1994). One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Ad-vanced Industrial Society. Moscow : Refl-book. 342 р. [In Russian].

Maffesoli, M. (2018). Tribal time. The decline of individualism in a postmod-ern society. Kiev : VD “Kyyevo-Mogylyans`ka akademiya”. 264 p. [In Ukrainian].

Xvorosty`na, O. V. (2017). Transmedia content. Crossmedia: Content, Tech-nology, Perspectives: A Collective Monograph. V. E. Shevchenko (Ed.). Kyiv. 130-138. [In Ukrainian].

Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. (1997) Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Moscow – St. Petersburg : Medy`um. Yuventa. 311 p. [In Russian].

Collins, J. (2017). Transmediaphilia, World Building, and Pleasures of the Per-sonal Digital Archive. World Building. Transmedia, Fans, Industries. M. Boni (Ed.). Amsterdam. 362-376.

Taylor, P., Harris, J. (2008). Critical Theories of Mass Media : Then and Now. Buckingem : Open University Press, 2008. 262 p.+ xiii.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.