Co-responsibility and (super)diversity: philosophical aspects of the contemporary discussions on integration
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

integration, reintegration, identity, social cohesion, co-responsibility, superdiversity

Abstract views: 41
PDF Downloads: 18

How to Cite

Balinchenko, S. (2019). Co-responsibility and (super)diversity: philosophical aspects of the contemporary discussions on integration. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (5-6), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.5-6.01

Abstract

The topicality of the issue on communities being restructured as a result of migration processes, in particular in Europe nowadays, leads to academic discussions on identity transformations under the pressure of the migrations, as well as to integration rethinking. The approach to integration has changed significantly, and the idea of the Other as an individual or a group in need of being adjusted to the social-cultural space of We has faded away, while being substituted by the recent shift from diversity to superdiversity, the nation-focused models of integration considered outdated. Integration emerges as a relation-based process aimed at communicative and discoursive discovering of the social and cultural markers disclosing the possibilities for citizens to reach social cohesion advantages, without the latter being instrumentally imposed through unifying efforts of those in power. The article dwells upon the questions, issues and conclusions of the recent discussion “Who needs integration?”; and the discoursive aspect of integration based on D-principle and migration-related aspects of its implementation has been paid due attention as well. Static and dynamic identity issues have been studied in the context of conflict-related migration situation in Ukraine. The challenges and practical discourses implying integration have been reviewed through the surveys’ data, 2017-2019, on the protracted displacement, relations between displaced persons and host communities, tolerance and civic engagement. Post-conflict reintegration problems have been outlined in the conclusions, through the issues on “return vs. integration” choice, “red lines”, and educational means and limitations of influence on the restructured communities, – as the perspectives for further research in the framework of the study.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.5-6.01
PDF (Українська)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.