The paper deals with Mircea Eliade’s concept of myth. The study aims to analyze the core features of the myth presented in Eliade’s works and to explain the essentiality of myth in the modern world. The main peculiarity of M. Eliade’s approach is that he discusses myth considering its value for people of archaic cultures since these people understood the fundamentality of this phenomenon. According to Eliade, myth is one of the components of reality and is sacred and veridical for primitive people. In addition, members of primitive cultures distinguish myth from the fictional stories, which means they are able to differentiate truth from fantasies, and myths are always true. Eliade defines five main features of the myth. Firstly, myths are stories about the exploits of gods and heroes. Secondly, myths are both sacred and true. Thirdly, myths are the narratives about the origin of all processes and phenomena. Fourthly, by means of myth, the one can cognize these processes themselves. Finally, the audience always lives the myth by means of the ritual. Furthermore, rituals play a great role in Eliade’s mythological concept since they allow the one to live in mythological time, instead of historical time. The author of the paper argues that Eliade’s myth satisfies the one's existential demands allowing him (her)to structuralize the world and to find a fulcrum. Additionally, myths and their modern equivalents create important behavioral patterns. Considering the importance of myths in modernity, the author of the article comes to the conclusion that such important phenomena as religion (including Christianity), politics, literature, and arts, as well as the traditions, dreams, and imagination, are derived from myths. Therefore, despite the process of demythologization, myths still influence the lives of modern people
Kanarska, V. P. (2013). Formation and Development of Mircea Eliade’s Concept of Myth. Naukovi Pratsi Kamianets-Podilskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu Imeni Ivana Ohiienka. Filolohichni Nauky. (Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University Research Papers. Philosophical Studies), 34, 349-351. [In Ukrainian].
Kirilenko. E. I. (2007). R. Barthes and M. Eliade: Two Interpretations of Myth. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta (Tomsk National University Journal), 297, 66-70. [In Russian].
Frys, I. (2012). 20th Century Mythological Concepts: an Overview. Kyivski Polonistychni Studii (Kyiv Polonian Studies), 19, 377-382. [In Ukrainian].
Eliade, M. (2010). Aspects of Myth. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proyekt. [In Russian].
Eliade, M. (1996). Myths, Dreams, and Mysteries. Moscow: REFL-book. [In Russian].
Eliade, M. (1994). The Sacred and The Profane. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU. [In Russian].
Allen, D. (2013). Myth and Religion in Mircea Eliade. New York: Routledge, 2013.
Barth, C. (2013). In Illo Tempore, at The Center of The World: Mircea Eliade and Religious Studies' Concepts of Sacred Time and Space. Historical Social Research, 38(3), 59-75.
Ngcobo, E. T. & Beyers, J. (2013). Is It Still Possible to Study Religion Religiously Today? Mircea Eliade's Religious Apologetic Account. Verbum Eccles, 34(1). Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2074-77052013000100018.
Ogunnaike, O. (2012). Myth and The Secret of Destiny: Mircea Eliade’s Creative Hermeneuticsand the Yorùbá Concept of Orí. Journal of Comparative Theology, 3(1),4-42.
Rennie, B. S. (2007). Mircea Eliade and The Perception of The Sacred in The Profane: Intention, Reduction, and Cognitive Theory. Temenos – Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 43(1), 73-98.