The article is devoted to the analysis of a new philosophical movements, a new system of work outlook called transhumanism, since a new view of a person and his opportunities is being formed in society. Analysis of sources from which the transhumanism originated concerns several stages where the initial prerequisites of this trend were formed. This article shows the philosophical ideas of transhumanist thought, the algorithm of realization of formation of transhumanism is considered, as a result of which the logic of reorientation in the system of values of mankind becomes clear. Also, the statements of a large number of Western scholars ‒ philosophers are presented about the prospects and consequences of this transhumanist project, obsessed only by human perfection, and not by its moral value. In modern scientific thought there are many adherents of transhumanism who do not see any contradictions between humanism and transhumanism. And there are also a large number of opponents of transhumanist ideas. There is a the third scientists group of gives a logical explanation of the transhumanist direction and at the same time offers a way out in order to avoid an adverse outcome. Author of article make an attempt of consideration of some types of alternative ways of settlement of disputes among supporters and opponents of transhumanism on the basis of philosophical experience of some scientists. Thus, summing up our research, we can say that, looking into the future, we can see that a person does not preserve his natural qualities as he develops and, under the influence of technogenic engineering, turns into a being, like things, which, depending on the circumstances, have different intellectual, creative, physical and other properties and at the same time lose their moral and spiritual.
Aksenov, I. V. (2016). Transhumanism as a problem of philosophical and religious anthropology. Dissertation International. Retrieved from https://www.mininuniver.ru/images/docs/nauka/zaschita/Aksenov_I.V._Transgumanizm_kak_problema_filosofskoj_i_religioznoj_antropologii_te kst_ 14_.pdf. [in Russian].
Bodriyyar, Zh. (2012). The transparency of evil. Moscow: Dobrosvet Publ.; KDU Publ. 260 p. [in Russian].
Gnatik, E.N. (2012). Transhumanist projects in the convergent technology epoch. Chelovek i ego budushchee: novye tekhnologii i vozmozhnosti che-loveka (Man and their future: new technologies and human capabilities). Ed. by G.L. Belkina. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 343-354. [in Russian].
Demin, I.V. Humanism and transhumanism: the problem of correlation. Retrieved from: http://ecologyofthinking.ru/slayder-na-glavnoy/5108.html
History and philosophy of science and technology (2016). Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskoe predpriyatie «Maks-Info». [in Russian].
Kolʼtsov, N. K. (1922). Improving human nature. Russian eugenic journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 1-27. [in Russian].
Dictionary of gender terms. Z. Shevchenko (Compiled). Retrived on May 5th 2019 from http://a-z-gender.net/
Foucault, M. (1994). Words and things, Archaeology Humanities. St. Peters-burg: A-cad. [in Russian].
Epshteyn, M. (2004). Space character. Moscow: NLO. [in Russian].
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). NY: Harper & Row (In Engl.).= Heidegger, M. (2003) Being and time. Kharkov: Folio. [in Russian].
Harees, L. (2012). The Mirage of Dignity on the Highways of Human progress: the Bystanders Perspective. (L. Harees, Ed.). Bloomington: AuthorHouse.