Comparative analysis of sign concepts of G. Berkeley and J. Lock
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

G. Berkeley, J. Locke, sign, speech, word, idea, thing, sensation, semiotics

How to Cite

Mamenko, T. (2019). Comparative analysis of sign concepts of G. Berkeley and J. Lock. Multiversum. Philosophical Almanac, (1-2), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.1-2.02

Abstract

The article deals with Berkeley's semiotic views as alternatives to J. Lock's views. Rejecting the materialist ontology, Berkeley rethinks the meaning of the linguistic sign. Since ideas cease to refer to things, and things are a combination of simple ideas, their meaning language signs (words) obtained through the connection between ideas. This gives grounds to speak about the functional significance of the sign in contrast to the substantive, where behind the word must be a particular material thing, or a clear idea. Berkeley also expands the functions of language, language is needed not only for the transmission of information, it can express emotion, will, belief, etc.

https://doi.org/10.35423/2078-8142.2019.1-2.02
PDF (Українська)

References

Gowan, W. (1983). Mc. Berkeley's Doctrine of Signs In Colin M. Turbayne (Еd.). Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Manchester University Press.

Locke, John (1894). An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.

The Works of George Berkeley. (1901). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Luce, А. А. & Jessop, Т. Е. (Eds.) The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne. Vol. 5. London: Thomas Nelson and sons ltd.

Winkler, K. (2005). Berkeley and the doctrine of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Decombe, B. (2008). Institutions of meaning. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture. [Іn Ukrainian].

Melvıl, Iý.K. (1968). Charlz Pırs ı pragmatızm. Moscow.

Popper, K. (2000). Notes on Berkeley as the predecessor of Mach and Einstein. Vestnik novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Bulletin of Novgorod State University), 16. [Іn Russian].